-
Whether tax is required to be deducted
at source where a non-refundable deposit has been made by the
tenant?
In cases where the tenant makes a non-refundable deposit tax would
have to be deducted at source as such deposit represents the
consideration for the use of the land or the building, etc., and,
therefore, partakes of the nature of rent as defined in section 194-I.
If, however, the deposit is refundable, no tax would be deductible at
source. It is further clarified that if the deposit carries interest,
the tax to be deducted on the amount of interest will be governed by
section 194A of the Income-tax Act.
-
Whether the tax is to be deducted at source from Warehousing
charges?
The term Rent as defined under Section 194-I means any payment by
whatever name called, under any lease, sub-lease, tenancy or any other
agreement or arrangement for the use of any building or land.
Therefore, the warehousing charges will be subject to deduction of tax
under section 194-I.
-
On what amount the tax is to be deducted at source if the rentals
include Municipal tax, Ground rent, etc.?
The basis of tax deduction at source under section 194-I is income
by way of rent. Rent as defined, in the Section 194-I (i), to mean any
payment under any lease, tenancy, agreement, etc., for the use of any
land or building. Thus, if the municipal taxes, ground rent, etc., are
borne by the tenant, no tax will be deducted on such sum.
-
Whether payments made to a Hotel for Rooms
hired during the year
would be of the nature of Rent?
Payments made by persons, other individuals and HUFs for hotel
accommodation taken on regular basis will be in the nature of rent
subject to TDS under section 194-I.
-
Whether the limit of Rs. 1, 20,000 per annum would apply separately
for each Co-owner of a property?
Under section 194-I, the tax is deductible from payment by way of
rent, if such payment of the payee during the year is likely to be Rs.
1, 20,000 or more. If there are a number of payees, each having
definite and ascertainable share in the property, the limit of Rs. 1,
20,000 will apply to each of the payee/co-owner separately. The payers
and payees are, however, advised not to enter into sham agreements to
avoid TDS provisions.
-
Whether the rent paid should be enhanced for notional income in
respect of deposit given to the landlord?
The tax is to be deducted from actual payment and there is no need
of computing notional income in respect of a deposit given to the
landlord. If the deposit is adjustable against future rent, the
deposit is in the nature of advance rent subject to TDS.
-
Whether payments made by company taking premises on rent but
styling
the agreement as a business centre agreement would attract the
provisions of section 194-I ?
The tax is to be deducted from rent paid, by whatever name called,
for hire of a property. The incidence of deduction of tax at source
does not depend upon the nomenclature, but on the content of the
agreement as mentioned in clause (i) of Explanation to section 194-I.
-
Whether in a case of a composite arrangement for user of premises
and provision of manpower for which consideration is paid as a
specified percentage of turnover, section 194-I of the Act would be
attracted?
If the composite arrangement is in essence the agreement for taking
premises on rent, the tax will be deducted under section 194-I from
payments thereof.
-
Whether section 194-I is applicable to rent paid for the
use of only
a part or a portion of any land or building?
Yes, the definition of the term any land or any building would
include a part or a portion of such land or building.
-
Excerpts taken from Circular 715 (dtd. 8th Aug' 1995) and Circular
718 (dtd. 22nd Aug' 1995).